Latest from News

ID 49224902/ © Wavebreakmedia Ltd | Dreamstime.com
salesperson_typing_on_computer___id_49224902__wave
www.datawrapper.de
totalelectricalsalesestimates2023metrolevel_1920
Photo © 226496518 Mohd Izzuan Ros
acquisitions_2023_photo_226496518__mohd_izzuan_ros
Illustration © 19276996 / Dirk Erck / Dreamstime.com
people_onthe_move_illustration_19276996__dirk_erck
Photo 87684009 © / Sculpies / Dreamstime.com
housing_market_photo_87684009__sculpies__dreamstim
Photo 199231482 © Hye Jin Kang / Dreamstime
prices_cost_rising_photo_199231482___hye_jin_kang_
Photo 7507349 © Cornelius20 / Dreamstime.com
construction_landscape_photo_7507349__cornelius20_
© Endeavor Business Media
em08232024promo

Bridgeport Fittings Appeal Rejected By Court

Nov. 19, 2003
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a unanimous jury verdict of patent infringement that Arlington Industries, Inc., Scranton, Pa., obtained last summer against Bridgeport Fittings, Stratford, Conn.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a unanimous jury verdict of patent infringement that Arlington Industries, Inc., Scranton, Pa., obtained last summer against Bridgeport Fittings, Stratford, Conn. The verdict held that Bridgeport had infringed upon one of Arlington's plastic box extender patents. The jury rejected all of Bridgeport's defenses.

Del Auray, president of Bridgeport Fittings, Bridgeport, Conn., said, "The case refers to an older model Bridgeport product which is no longer sold, and the case resulted in an award to Arlington of less than $13,000...Bridgeport is confident that its current box extender products are the best on the market."