NAHB Sees 2007 As Year Of Transition

April 13, 2007
While most housing markets throughout the country experienced a year of decline in 2006 following the boom levels of the previous two years, 2007 is expected to be a year of transition, with growth emerging in many areas — according to the National Association of Home Builders’ (NAHB) Regional Housing Starts Forecast

While most housing markets throughout the country experienced a year of decline in 2006 following the boom levels of the previous two years, 2007 is expected to be a year of transition, with growth emerging in many areas — according to the National Association of Home Builders’ (NAHB) Regional Housing Starts Forecast. The forecast, available through NAHB’s HousingEconomics.com, reports on regional and state-by-state housing forecasts and analyzes the health of local housing markets.


The earlier housing boom can be attributed largely to excess demand generated by historically low interest rates coupled with aggressive mortgage lending practices, a combination that made homeownership more affordable but also attracted investors and speculators into many markets. These factors put inordinate upward pressure on sales, prices and production. Major downward corrections occurred in housing markets during 2006 and further adjustments have extended into the early part of 2007.


“Because the boom and correction cycle has largely been driven by national rather than local factors, most regions have experienced some degree of over-heating and correction,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Seiders. “We expect 2007 to be a time of transition in most regions, with housing starts bottoming out in the early part of the year before transitioning to gradual recovery paths.”


According to the report, housing markets with the biggest booms in 2004 and 2005 are generally expected to be the slowest to return to normal levels of activity and those that showed more restraint will be the first to show growth — with notable exceptions concentrated in the industrial Midwest. In addition to the state-by-state analysis, the report examines data for seven major Census regions and divisions. Highlights include:


South Atlantic. This division of the country had widely varied housing experiences, with areas like Georgia as well as Asheville, Charlotte, Durham, Greensboro, Raleigh and Winston-Salem metro areas in North Carolina all experiencing only modest declines in 2006, leaving the areas near or above pre-boom levels of production. In contrast, many markets in Florida experienced some of the highest levels of overheating with markets like Orlando seeing housing starts spike to 150 percent of normal activity.


West South Central. Dominated by Texas, which accounts for roughly 75 percent of its housing starts, the West South Central division had the strongest growth during the boom and has maintained the highest level of production through the correction. The division also includes the New Orleans metro area which has seen its pace of housing starts emerge from its 2005 collapse to rival pre-Katrina levels.


East South Central. NAHB’s East South Central division — comprised of Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi and Tennessee — was the only area other than the NAHB’s West South Central division to have housing production levels at the end of 2006 above pre-boom levels.


Mountain. The Phoenix metro area rose to 149 percent of pre-boom demand in 2005 before dropping to 79 percent by the end of 2006, making it one of the most volatile markets in the nation. Las Vegas performed similarly with prices rising rapidly, primarily due to investor demand. NAHB forecasts that due to the steep corrections, these areas will grow moderately this year and next as they cope with the prices, production and investor excesses that swamped them.


Pacific. Major markets such as Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco are expected to experience strong gains in 2007 based on deceleration in prices and the absence of over-production during the boom and the depth of their slowdowns in 2006.


Northeast. In comparison to the South and West, the Northeast has experienced a fairly restrained housing cycle. Major metro areas such as Boston and New York had production levels that looked more like recovery from a slowdown earlier in the decade rather than an over-stimulated boom. Due to the fundamental health of the underlying economies, a quick recovery and a return to more normal levels of production is expected in these markets.

Midwest. The Midwest region suffered the most in this housing cycle with the lowest peak during the boom and deepest the trough during the correction, due largely to weakened economies in the region’s industrial cities like Detroit and Kansas City.